In my video Characters A and B are in a classroom whilst
character C enters the classroom from the hallway. Once character C is in the
classroom, he loses his balance and falls flat on his face. After character C
composes himself, character A is seen in a shocked state.
We attempted to create a 'narrative flow' by first having a
two shot of characters A and B in a classroom as an establishing shot. We then
attempted to create a cross cutting shot in shot two when character C is outside
of the classroom in the hall way leading up to it. This is so that the audience
could tell that the two pieces of action were happening simultaneously and will
eventually combine. In shot 3 we then crossed back to inside
the classroom with both character A and the classroom door visible. This use of
a master shot was to show the geographic space and show the characters interacting
in the same place. We attempted to have a match on action shot in shot 3 to
increase continuity by having footage of character c walking towards the
classroom door so that the cut from the previous shot was not too harsh. In
shot 4, when character C eventually falls over, we decided to pan across this
room to follow this action as we felt it was more fluid. At the end of shot 4
character C has fallen over and has his books scattered around him. Although we
changed the angle and framing of the next shot, we attempted to keep good
continuity by trying to keep character C as still as possible so that he
appeared in the same position in the next shot. In the final shot we had a
reaction shot of character A as we felt that it made the scene more
naturalistic as people would expect a reaction if there were other people in
the room.
We were unable to achieve full continuity as it is very
difficult to achieve this without editing any of the footage taken. Although we
attempted to be as precise as possible, delays in starting or stopping the
filming of shots resulted in a video that was not perfectly continuous. Despite this, I do think that our video had a good narrative flow as it flowed well enough for the audience to be able to understand the clip. In hindsight,
I would change the length that some shots were shot at in order to improve the
narrative flow and tell the story more effectively. For example, I would cut
down the first shot by a large amount (roughly 6 seconds) as it is only an
establishing shot and is able to meet its purpose of setting the scene in very
little time. In shot 2 I would start character C off frame so that when he begins
walking there is no long pause. This would help the scene seem more naturalistic.
In the 3rd shot I would cut some of the footage at the beginning so that
character C starts the scene already close to the classroom door in order to
achieve a much more precise match on action shot. Character A would also react
to character c entering the room by looking up at him in order to increase the
naturalistic aspects of the scene. I would also reconsider the framing of shot
4 as although the Low Angle shot provides diversity in shot types; it makes a
very apparent jump in the positioning of the camera which hinders the narrative
flow. In shot 4 I would also include a trip hazard for character C to fall over
so that his accident looked more realistic. Although we tried to prevent this,
there is an apparent jump cut between shots 4 and 5 as character c appears to
move positions slightly after he falls. If I could do this task again I would
ensure that the actor stayed perfectly still in order to prevent this jump cut.
Another change that I would make would be to swap around shots 5 and 6 in order
to prevent the delay in reaction from character A. This would make for a more
believable scenario and would increase the narrative flow of the video.
No comments:
Post a Comment